![]() I think it's only natural that Shostakovich has become a receptacle for people's polarized political viewpoints. Therefore, I take a tempo that is not too fast nor too slow, neither giddy nor funereal. It signals a moment of weakness and affects how I approach the coda - the sort of "summary statement." Shostakovich ends by offering an opening for hopefulness, for a certain nobility in survival. I hear the last movement as a gradual acceleration of forces, an increasing sense of hysteria and loss of control until things break down and the fanfare (like the theme) becomes almost nightmarish in sound.įor me, this is an important trasformation. ![]() But Leonard Bernstein doubled the tempo in his recording with the New York Philharmonic, and Shostakovich thought it worked very well.įor me, this is a defining moment in the symphony, determined by the entirety of the last movement, and even the journey of the entire piece. Shostakovich was emerging from a period of total musical banishment with his fifth symphony, calling it "a response to my critics."Īgainst that backdrop, how can we not listen to the work without reading between the notes? Is the blatant patriotic fervor emblematic of Shostakovich's desire to please his comrades, or a genuine outburst of love for his homeland? Or is it an extreme form of irony, ingeniously straddling both sides of a dangerous abyss?įrom the opening battle between upper and lower strings to the complete desolation and apathy of the violin melody a few bars later, imagining Shostakovich's personal viewpoint can't help but have an impact on how to interpret his music in a heightened way.įor example, how fast should it be played? At the very end of the symphony, Shostakovich's original tempo marking is quite slow. 5, written at the height of the Stalinist purges of 1937, when millions of Soviet citizens were forcibly relocated, exiled and/or killed outright. Not surprisingly, then, his life and work are marked by paradox and ambiguity.įor me, nothing expresses that duality and struggle as much as his Symphony No. It was his fate to be a monumental creative talent living in the Soviet Union - one of history's most restrictive, whimsical, and repressive regimes. In a world where soundbites dominate and categorization abounds, Shostakovich presents a challenge to define. New York Philharmonic, Leonard Bernstein conducting.Īside from the obvious marketing hooks, the 100th anniversary of the birth of Russian composer Dmitri Shostakovich this week gives us an opportunity to delve more deeply into the less-explored music and dimensions of the man. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |